ukrtb

For Christmas I received an intriguing present from a buddy - my really own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (terrific title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has radiant evaluations.

Yet it was completely written by AI, systemcheck-wiki.de with a couple of easy triggers about me provided by my buddy Janet.

It's a fascinating read, and really funny in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, and is somewhere between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty design of composing, but it's likewise a bit recurring, and very verbose. It may have surpassed Janet's triggers in collating information about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading technology reporter ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mysterious, repeated hallucination in the form of my feline (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of business online offering AI -book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the chief executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually offered around 150,000 personalised books, generally in the US, because pivoting from compiling AI -generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to produce them, based on an open source big language model.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, sitiosecuador.com who created it, can order any further copies.

There is presently no barrier to anybody developing one in anyone's name, including celebs - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive material. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer specifying that it is fictional, developed by AI, and created "solely to bring humour and pleasure".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the firm, but Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is intended as a "customised gag present", and the books do not get sold further.

He hopes to widen his range, producing different categories such as sci-fi, and possibly offering an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted type of consumer AI - offering AI -generated items to human consumers.

It's likewise a bit scary if, like me, you compose for scientific-programs.science a living. Not least because it most likely took less than a minute to produce, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound just like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable material based upon it.

"We should be clear, when we are discussing data here, we really imply human creators' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which for AI firms to regard creators' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is photos. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to learn how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were phony, it was still extremely popular.

"I do not believe using generative AI for innovative purposes should be banned, however I do believe that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on people's work without authorization ought to be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be really effective however let's build it ethically and fairly."

OpenAI states Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have selected to block AI designers from trawling their online material for training purposes. Others have decided to work together - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK federal government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would permit AI designers to use creators' material on the web to help establish their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "insanity".

He explains that AI can make advances in locations like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and destroying the livelihoods of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is also strongly against removing copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million tasks and a great deal of happiness," states the Baroness, morphomics.science who is likewise an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is weakening one of its finest carrying out industries on the unclear guarantee of development."

A government representative said: "No move will be made until we are definitely confident we have a useful plan that provides each of our goals: increased control for ideal holders to assist them license their material, access to top quality product to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for right holders from AI developers."

Under the UK government's new AI strategy, a national information library consisting of public information from a large range of sources will also be offered to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal rules to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to improve the safety of AI with, among other things, companies in the sector needed to share details of the workings of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.

But this has now been repealed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is said to desire the AI sector to deal with less guideline.

This comes as a number of lawsuits against AI companies, and especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been taken out by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They claim that the AI companies broke the law when they took their content from the web without their authorization, and used it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are for that reason exempt. There are a number of elements which can constitute reasonable use - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it collects training data and whether it ought to be paying for it.

If this wasn't all enough to contemplate, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It became one of the most downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it established its innovation for a fraction of the price of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's present supremacy of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I believe that at the moment, if I actually want a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weakness in generative AI tools for larger jobs. It has lots of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be quite tough to read in parts since it's so long-winded.

But given how rapidly the tech is progressing, I'm not sure for how long I can stay confident that my significantly slower human writing and modifying skills, are better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest developments in worldwide innovation, with analysis from BBC reporters around the globe.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.